How about the Torqeedo Cruise 2.0 for a C22???
How about the Torqeedo Cruise 2.0 for a C22???
Is any one using the Torqeedo Cruise 2.0 on their C22? It is rated at 6 HP equivalent and they say it can be used on up to a 6000 LB displacement hull. Price is competitive too...about $2500 new.
Bill
- Capt. Bondo
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:08 am
- Location: Hudson, WI
Yeah Capt....the deep cycles are pricey but should last a long time if cared for properly....I know that not everyone can afford the newest and best, that includes me....but I still think that in the long run the cost and convenience may equal things out.
I'm thinking that the two batteries in the center area of the boat would make good ballast and the lighter weight of the motor on the stern helps with fore and aft balance. Easier to take on and off for us older folks too...the batteries just stay in the boat all the time...outa sight and outa mind.
By the way Capt. Bondo....where do you sail?...what river is that?
I'm thinking that the two batteries in the center area of the boat would make good ballast and the lighter weight of the motor on the stern helps with fore and aft balance. Easier to take on and off for us older folks too...the batteries just stay in the boat all the time...outa sight and outa mind.
By the way Capt. Bondo....where do you sail?...what river is that?
Bill
- Capt. Bondo
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:08 am
- Location: Hudson, WI
-
skyking
I had started the season with an electric motor 52# thrust. I have to say that it was nice and quiet, but very slow and, when there was any amount of wind, it was not what worth a damn..
I really thought that it wold be the way to go, but its been replaced 2 weeks ago with a Johnson 9 1/2 hp...
It sounds like the Torqeedo Cruise 2.0 should be much better suited for the job!!
I really thought that it wold be the way to go, but its been replaced 2 weeks ago with a Johnson 9 1/2 hp...
It sounds like the Torqeedo Cruise 2.0 should be much better suited for the job!!
- sauerleigh
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: Ohio
Personally, an electric propulsion system would best be used on a smaller inland lake where you won't be fighting wave action. 2000 watts at full power can run down a battery pretty quickly and the output is rated at 900 watts, about 45% efficiency. You can always add more batteries but that also means more weight, and the batteries should be supported on some kind of platform, especially if you plan on trailering.
I've been messing about with electrics for years and we're not quite there yet. www.Bricycles.com
I've been messing about with electrics for years and we're not quite there yet. www.Bricycles.com
1978 Chrysler 26 "Maudie Kay"
1984 Catalina 25 "REDUX" (rebuild)
It's better late than never
1984 Catalina 25 "REDUX" (rebuild)
It's better late than never